Okay, guys, let’s talk about Evans and Moore today. I’ve been messing around with these two recently, and I wanted to share my little journey with you all.
So, first off, I had this API, and I needed a way to test it. I heard about this thing called Evans, which is basically a command-line tool for interacting with gRPC APIs. Sounded cool, so I decided to give it a shot.
Getting Evans up and running was pretty straightforward. I just followed the instructions on their website, and bam, it was installed. The first thing I did was use the `call` command to send a request to my API. It was awesome. I could see the request and response right there in my terminal. Super handy for debugging.
But then, I needed a GUI, you know, something with buttons and stuff. That’s where Moore came in. Moore is kind of like a more user-friendly version of Evans. It’s got this nice interface where you can easily see all your services and methods.
- I installed Moore, which was also a breeze.
- Then, I connected it to my gRPC server.
- And just like that, I had a visual representation of my API.
Diving Deeper
I started playing around with both tools, sending requests, inspecting responses, the whole shebang. It was actually quite fun! What I really liked about Evans was its simplicity. If you’re comfortable with the command line, it’s a great tool to have in your arsenal.
Moore, on the other hand, was perfect for when I wanted a more visual approach. It made it easy to explore my API and understand how everything was connected. Plus, it was just easier on the eyes, you know?
Honestly, after messing with these tools, I felt like a gRPC wizard. I could debug my API in no time, test different scenarios, and even see some nice graphs of my requests. It was a game-changer for my workflow. And that is all for today’s share. Let me know if you’ve used Evans or Moore, and what your experience has been like. See ya!